Segment
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Premium2. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Upper-middle3. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Michelin Alpin 5 vs. Barum Polaris 3 vs. Uniroyal MS plus 77
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Michelin Alpin 5 5.882. Barum Polaris 3 10.63. Uniroyal MS plus 77 11.21
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary2. Michelin Alpin 5 Very good3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Alpin 5 Recommended2. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory3. Uniroyal MS plus 77 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 6 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
6
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |||
| Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | 2- | |||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 37,1 | 28,4 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 36,7 | 27,8 | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 36,1 | 27,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Barum Polaris 3 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 1- | 2+ | |||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2 | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 33,3 | 28,7 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 35,8 | 27,6 | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 36 | 28,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Michelin Alpin 5 Rating: - | 2+ | 2 | 1- | 2 | |||
| Barum Polaris 3 Rating: - | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 Rating: - | 2- | 3 | 1- | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Michelin Alpin 5 | 35,6 | 25,8 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 37,2 | 26,1 | |||||
| Uniroyal MS plus 77 | 39,1 | 25,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
