Segment
1. Michelin Agilis+ Premium2. Kleber Transpro Upper-middle3. Kumho PorTran KC53 Upper-middle4. Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Michelin Agilis+ vs. Kleber Transpro vs. Fulda Conveo Tour 2 vs. Kumho PorTran KC53
| # | Michelin Agilis+
| Kleber Transpro
| Fulda Conveo Tour 2
| Kumho PorTran KC53
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |  |  |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R16 | R14 - R16 | R12 - R17 | |
| Price | |||||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Michelin Agilis+ 70 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Michelin Agilis+ Rating: Poor | 4,9 | 2,9 | 3,3 | 0,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Kleber Transpro Rating: Poor | 5,5 | 3,6 | 2,9 | 1,5 | 2,3 | ||
| Fulda Conveo Tour 2 Rating: Poor | 5,0 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 0,5 | 1,9 | ||
| Kumho PorTran KC53 Rating: Sufficient | 3,8 | 3,2 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
