In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Kumho (63%). But when it comes to comparing Michelin AGILIS ALPIN and Kumho PorTran CW51, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Michelin AGILIS ALPIN was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Kumho PorTran CW51 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the AGILIS ALPIN and the PorTran CW51 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin AGILIS ALPIN has B wet grip rating, whereas 67% of Kumho PorTran CW51 has C rating.
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAC
|
Winter
|
2019 | 205/65 R16 | View |
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
Kumho PorTran CW51
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
Kumho PorTran CW51
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
Kumho PorTran CW51
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
Kumho PorTran CW51
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
Kumho PorTran CW51
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
Kumho PorTran CW51
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
Kumho PorTran CW51
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
Kumho PorTran CW51
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
Kumho PorTran CW51
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
Kumho PorTran CW51
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.