Segment
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. Continental VanContact Winter Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (96%) than Michelin (91%). But when it comes to comparing Michelin AGILIS ALPIN and Continental VanContact Winter, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the AGILIS ALPIN and the VanContact Winter were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Michelin AGILIS ALPIN dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the Continental VanContact Winter also have B wet ratings.
# | Michelin AGILIS ALPIN
| Continental VanContact Winter
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium2. Continental VanContact Winter Premium
1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended2. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Recommended | 2,9 | 3,4 | 2,5 | 2,4 | 3,2 | 2,0 | 2,0 |
Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 3,0 | 2,2 |
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Still recommended | |||||||
Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended | |||||||
Show test details |