Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Premium3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium4. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Lowcost5. Avon ZV7 Lowcost
Comparison: Maxxis Victra Sport 5 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro vs. Avon ZV7
Number of sizes available
1. Avon ZV7 278
Number of tests
Best position in test
5. Avon ZV7 8.
Worst position in test
5. Avon ZV7 42.
Average position in tests
5. Avon ZV7 18.55
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary2. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary3. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Highly recommended5. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended4. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Conditionally recommended5. Avon ZV7 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Maxxis Victra Sport 5 | 33.9 | 29.2 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro | 35.0 | 31.2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
