Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Lowcost3. Nexen N fera Sport Lowcost
Comparison: Maxxis Victra Sport 5 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Nexen N fera Sport
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nexen N fera Sport Exemplary2. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary3. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Nexen N fera Sport Satisfactory3. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Rating: Good | |||||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Maxxis Victra Sport 5 | 33.9 | 29.2 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro | 35.0 | 31.2 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Sport | 35.0 | 30.9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
