Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Premium3. Falken Azenis FK520 Upper-middle4. Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Upper-middle5. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Lowcost6. Linglong Sport Master Lowcost7. Nexen N fera Sport Lowcost
Comparison: Maxxis Victra Sport 5 vs. Linglong Sport Master vs. Nexen N fera Sport vs. Falken Azenis FK520 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Toyo Proxes Sport 2 vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+
Sure, here's your article:
The Maxxis Victra Sport 5 and the Linglong Sport Master are two summer UHP tyres that came under the microscope in our tests. Here, in detail, is a comprehensive comparison between the two.
The Maxxis Victra Sport 5, originating from CN, does a commendable job on wet surfaces with good safety reserves in aquaplaning and secure dynamic handling. In Autobild's review, the tyre's best feature was its commendable wet circle cornering, earning it the 9th position out of 50 tyres in the test. However, its shortcomings show in average mileage and noticeably delayed steering response. This tyre does not have a newer model.
On the other hand, the Linglong Sport Master, lauded for its impressively low exterior noise, claimed the 7th position in the Autobild test. What makes it a worthy contender though, are its short braking distances, dynamic, and secure handling in all weathers, and good level of directional control. However, its lack of endurance, dramatically understeering in dry handling, and moderate comfort level diminish its overall appeal. Also, there isn't a newer variant of this model available yet.
Both tyres have been through a rigorous round of testing in autobild 2021 and autobild 2023 attesting to similar strengths and weaknesses. The Maxxis tyre delivered consistent performance with good aquaplaning safety reserves and secure dynamic wet handling, but suffered from average mileage and delayed steering response. The Linglong tyre too, maintained its profile with short brake distances on wet and dry surfaces, paired with quiet rolling noise and economic pricing, but was includes low overall mileage and understeering in dry handling as its drawbacks.
In conclusion, with our rating of 69%, Maxxis Victra Sport 5 outperforms the Linglong Sport Master at 64%, primarily due to its superior handling on wet surfaces. Both tyres need improvement in the mileage department, suggesting lower than average durability.
You can explore more details about Maxxis and Linglong summer UHP tyres on their respective pages.
Our verdict: For exceptional handling on wet surfaces, go with the Maxxis Victra Sport 5. If looking for quiet ride quality and smooth handling in all weathers, the Linglong Sport Master might be a good choice. But bear in mind, in terms of overall performance and durability, Maxxis outshines Linglong.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nexen N fera Sport Exemplary2. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary3. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Highly recommended4. Falken Azenis FK520 Highly recommended7. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
4. Nexen N fera Sport Satisfactory5. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory6. Falken Azenis FK520 Good -7. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
5
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Linglong Sport Master Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Nexen N fera Sport Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Maxxis Victra Sport 5 | 33.9 | 29.2 | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master | 34.2 | 27.4 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Sport | 35.0 | 30.9 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro | 35.0 | 31.2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Linglong Sport Master Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 3 | ||||
| Nexen N Fera Sport Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 3+ | ||||
| Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2+ | 3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | |||||
| Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 2- | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK520 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Maxxis Victra Sport 5 | 60.8 | 26.7 | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master | 60.2 | 25.8 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Sport | 63.2 | 27.2 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK520 | 60.7 | 27 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes Sport 2 | 61 | 26.9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
