Segment
1. Michelin Agilis+ Premium2. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Lowcost
Comparison: Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ vs. Michelin Agilis+
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Maxxis) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Maxxis (59%). But when it comes to comparing Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ and Michelin Agilis+, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the Vansmart MCV3+ and the Agilis+ were tested.
| # | Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+
| Michelin Agilis+
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Michelin Agilis+ 70 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Rating: Sufficient | 3,7 | 2,2 | 3,0 | 0,5 | 2,3 | ||
| Michelin Agilis+ Rating: Poor | 4,9 | 2,9 | 3,3 | 0,5 | 2,2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
