Segment
1. Kumho PorTran KC53 Upper-middle2. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Lowcost
Comparison: Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ vs. Kumho PorTran KC53
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Maxxis) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Maxxis summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Kumho (58%). But when it comes to comparing Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ and Kumho PorTran KC53, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the Vansmart MCV3+ and the PorTran KC53 were tested.
| # | Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+
| Kumho PorTran KC53
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R12 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient2. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient2. Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,8 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 0,5 | 1,7 | ||
| Maxxis Vansmart MCV3+ Rating: Sufficient | 3,7 | 2,2 | 3,0 | 0,5 | 2,3 | ||
| Kumho PorTran KC53 Rating: Sufficient | 3,8 | 3,2 | 2,7 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
