• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Maxxis Premitra HP5 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Mutual tests overview

Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results

Tests used in comparison (2)

Organization Season Year Dimension Action
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2024 205/55 R16 View
Autobild Autobild
Summer
2022 215/55 R17 View

In this comparison, we will consider two summer tyres, Maxxis Premitra HP5 and Kumho Ecsta HS52. These tyres from Maxxis and Kumho respectively are known for their distinct performance patterns across various driving conditions.


The Maxxis Premitra HP5 received a rating of 69% from our tests. As per the Autobild test, it ranked 16 out of 51, indicating good performance with particular strengths in aquaplaning - both cross and longitudinal. The text summary from the Autobild 2023 and 2024 praised its high mileage and short dry braking distances but noted its delayed steering response and moderate grip levels on wet and dry tracks. The 2022 report suggested very good safety reserves during aquaplaning and short wet brakes but also pointed at understeering during dry handling and limited mileage.


The Kumho Ecsta HS52, which succeeded the Kumho Ecsta HS51, received a rating of 78% from our tests, positioning it above its Maxxis counterpart. The tyre fared exceptionally well in the Autobild test, securing the 3rd position out of 51 and showing notable strengths in dry braking, dry handling, wet braking and price/value. The tyre offers convincing performance on wet and dry tracks, with short dry braking distances and a competitive price point, albeit with moderate deflection comfort, as per reports from Autobild 2024. Conversely, the Autobild 2022 report lauded its balanced performance potential, suggesting short wet and dry braking distances, comfort, and good value for money, but criticized its late steering response.


To conclude, the Kumho Ecsta HS52 emerged as a more balanced performer, excelling particularly in dry and wet braking, handling, and offering good comfort and price. However, the Maxxis Premitra HP5 provides commendable aquaplaning safety, decent mileage, and short dry braking distances, though it suffers in steering responsiveness and grip levels. We recommend the HS52 for buyers seeking a more comprehensive tyre for various driving conditions, albeit with some steering input delay, while the HP5 may suit users looking for aquaplaning safety and dry braking performances.

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Maxxis Premitra HP5
71%
Maxxis
Premitra HP5
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Wet Braking
Maxxis Premitra HP5
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Wet Handling
Maxxis Premitra HP5
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
74%
Wet Circle Cornering
Maxxis Premitra HP5
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Maxxis Premitra HP5
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Best: Vredestein ULTRAC (95.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Maxxis Premitra HP5
86%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
59%
Best: Debica Presto UHP2 (96.0%)
Best in category: Vredestein ULTRAC (91.2%)
Dry Performance
Maxxis Premitra HP5
66%
Maxxis
Premitra HP5
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Dry Braking
Maxxis Premitra HP5
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Dry Handling
Maxxis Premitra HP5
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Best: Vredestein ULTRAC (92.0%)
Best in category: Bridgestone Turanza T005 (87.0%)
Comfort & Noise
Maxxis Premitra HP5
71%
Maxxis
Premitra HP5
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Noise Exterior
Maxxis Premitra HP5
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
74%
Ride Comfort
Maxxis Premitra HP5
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Best in category: Michelin Primacy 4+ (91.0%)
Economy
Maxxis Premitra HP5
56%
Maxxis
Premitra HP5
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Rolling Resistance
Maxxis Premitra HP5
55%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
63%
Mileage
Maxxis Premitra HP5
56%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
68%
Best in category: Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 (96.0%)

Performance spider chart

Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison