Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Premium2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle3. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle4. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Lowcost
Comparison: Maxxis Premitra HP5 vs. Kumho Crugen HP91 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Satin vs. Nokian Line SUV
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Highly recommended2. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Very good3. Nokian Line SUV Good4. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory3. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Still recommended4. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Dry driving behavior
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Grass traction
Gravel traction
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Maxxis Premitra HP5 Rating: Recommended | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Kumho Crugen HP91 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Satin Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
