Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Premium2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle3. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Lowcost
Comparison: Maxxis Premitra HP5 vs. Kumho Crugen HP91 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Satin
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Highly recommended2. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Very good3. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory2. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Still recommended3. Maxxis Premitra HP5 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry handling
Dry braking
Dry driving behavior
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Handling on gravel
Grass traction
Gravel traction
Mud traction
1. Kumho Crugen HP91 100%
Sand traction
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel efficiency
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Offroad | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | ||||
| Maxxis Premitra HP5 Rating: Recommended | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Kumho Crugen HP91 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Satin Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
