• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Maxxis Premitra HP5 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Vredestein ULTRAC vs. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Michelin Primacy 4+

The Maxxis Premitra HP5 and the Continental PremiumContact 7 are both summer tyres, commonly compared in tyre tests. This comparison aims to detail their performance based on several tests and provide some insights into their strengths and weaknesses.


The Maxxis Premitra HP5 is produced by Maxxis, a leading tyre manufacturer. While the HP5 has not replaced any previous models nor been replaced by a newer model, there have been numerous independent tests conducted on it.


This tyre scored a good overall rating of 56%, with its top feature being its cross Aquaplaning performance. However, it stood 8th in both the Autozeitung and Autobild tests, which counted a total of 9 and 55 tyres respectively. The strengths of this tyre seem to include a high mileage and short braking distances on dry roads. On the other hand, its weaknesses are delayed steering response and moderate grip levels on both wet and dry tracks.


On the contrary, the Continental PremiumContact 7, produced by Continental, delivers exceptional performance. This touring tyre made in France, Slovakia, Germany, and the Czech Republic is the latest in a line of previous models - PremiumContact 6 and ContiPremiumContact 5. It received a stellar overall rating of 97%, proving its worth in test performance.


The PremiumContact 7 stood first in both the Autozeitung and Autobild tests affirming its high performing characteristics. Its strengths encompass a wide range of aspects, such as wet safety, wet handling, dry braking, dry handling and excellent wet and dry cornering stability. The tyre test data does not explicitly mention any weaknesses for this model. Evidently, the Continental PremiumContact 7 boasts top-notch performance in terms of safety, braking, and handling on both wet and dry roads.


In summary, both tyres have notable features, but the Continental PremiumContact 7 clearly outshines the Maxxis Premitra HP5 in performance and ratings. It bagged the top spot in all tests, whereas the HP5 stood at 8th position. Therefore, based on the test results, the Continental tyre is the more recommendable choice between the two models.

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Maxxis Premitra HP5
60%
Maxxis
Premitra HP5
Continental PremiumContact 7
80%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
91%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
68%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Wet Braking
Maxxis Premitra HP5
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Vredestein ULTRAC
82%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
73%
Wet Handling
Maxxis Premitra HP5
51%
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
84%
Vredestein ULTRAC
92%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Best: Vredestein ULTRAC (92.0%)
Wet Circle Cornering
Maxxis Premitra HP5
51%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
75%
Vredestein ULTRAC
92%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
67%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
Maxxis Premitra HP5
57%
Continental PremiumContact 7
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Vredestein ULTRAC
95%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
57%
Michelin Primacy 4+
76%
Best: Vredestein ULTRAC (95.0%)
Aquaplaning Cross
Maxxis Premitra HP5
76%
Continental PremiumContact 7
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
57%
Vredestein ULTRAC
95%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
66%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Best in category: Vredestein ULTRAC (91.2%)
Dry Performance
Maxxis Premitra HP5
67%
Maxxis
Premitra HP5
Continental PremiumContact 7
84%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho Ecsta HS52
91%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
87%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
83%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Dry Braking
Maxxis Premitra HP5
81%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
90%
Vredestein ULTRAC
81%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
81%
Michelin Primacy 4+
81%
Dry Handling
Maxxis Premitra HP5
53%
Continental PremiumContact 7
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
92%
Vredestein ULTRAC
92%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%
Comfort & Noise
Maxxis Premitra HP5
64%
Maxxis
Premitra HP5
Continental PremiumContact 7
64%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
73%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Noise Exterior
Maxxis Premitra HP5
64%
Continental PremiumContact 7
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
82%
Vredestein ULTRAC
73%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
73%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%
Economy
Maxxis Premitra HP5
66%
Maxxis
Premitra HP5
Continental PremiumContact 7
74%
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Vredestein ULTRAC
46%
Vredestein
ULTRAC
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
72%
Hankook
Ventus Prime 4
Michelin Primacy 4+
84%
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Rolling Resistance
Maxxis Premitra HP5
59%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
67%
Vredestein ULTRAC
59%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
84%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Mileage
Maxxis Premitra HP5
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Vredestein ULTRAC
32%
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
59%
Michelin Primacy 4+
93%
Best in category: GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 (92.0%)

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Loading...

Add to comparison