18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van /0%	Falken EuroWinter VAN01 /0%	Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 /0%	Michelin AGILIS ALPIN /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak W810 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R16	R14 - R17	R14 - R17	R15 - R17	R14 - R17
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Premium

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Upper-middle

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle

5. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 56

2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 32

3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 23

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 19

5. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van 18

Number of tests

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 2x

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 1x

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 1x

4. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van 1x

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 1x

Best position in test

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 3.

2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 6.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 7.

4. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van 9.

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 11.

Worst position in test

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 3.

2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 6.

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 7.

4. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van 9.

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 11.

Average position in tests

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 3

2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 6

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 7

4. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van 9

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 11

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 2019

2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 2019

3. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van 2019

4. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 2019

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 2019

Best rating in test

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Recommended

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Conditionally recommended

4. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended

Worst rating in test

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Still recommended

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Conditionally recommended

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Conditionally recommended

4. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Matador
MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

69%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

67%

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01

66%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

55%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter WY01

50%

Wet handling

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 69%

2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van 66%

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 57%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 34%

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 32%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van 78%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 78%

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 67%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 67%

5. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 67%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van 67%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 67%

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 67%

4. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 59%

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 56%

Wet braking

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 75%

2. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 71%

3. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van 62%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 40%

5. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 40%

Wet circle cornering

1. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 72%

2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van 72%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 61%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 61%

5. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 61%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 B

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN B

3. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van C

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 C

5. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

84%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

79%

Matador
MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

77%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter WY01

69%

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01

48%

Snow braking

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 89%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 78%

3. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van 78%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 78%

5. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 56%

Snow handling

1. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van 80%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 76%

3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 74%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 58%

5. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 40%

Snow traction

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 83%

3. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van 72%

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 72%

5. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 50%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter WY01

68%

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01

68%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

59%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

49%

Matador
MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

48%

Dry braking

1. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 89%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 82%

3. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 78%

4. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van 71%

5. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 61%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
BluEarth winter WY01

83%

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01

81%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

75%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

56%

Matador
MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

54%

Exterior noise

1. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 91%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 87%

3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 81%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 44%

5. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van 42%

Interior noise

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 78%

2. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN 77%

3. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 71%

4. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 67%

5. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van 67%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 72 dB

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 75 dB

3. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN ?

4. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 ?

5. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

87%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter WY01

81%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

76%

Matador
MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

69%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN E

2. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 E

3. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van E

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 F

5. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Michelin
AGILIS ALPIN

84%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter WY01

81%

Bridgestone
Blizzak W810

74%

Matador
MPS530 Sibir Snow Van

74%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2019 205/65 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,4	2,3	2,2	2,3	2,5	2,0	1,6
Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Rating: Conditionally recommended	3,2	4,1	2,6	2,8	3,8	3,0	2,6
Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Rating: Conditionally recommended	3,3	3,2	4,0	2,3	2,6	2,0	1,8
Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Rating: Conditionally recommended	4,2	3,2	3,0	2,5	2,5	2,5	2,0
Michelin AGILIS ALPIN Rating: Recommended	2,9	3,4	2,5	2,4	3,2	2,0	2,0
Bridgestone Blizzak W810 Rating: Conditionally recommended	4,0	4,1	2,6	2,8	3,7	3,0	2,0
Show test details

Comparison: Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 vs. Michelin AGILIS ALPIN vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands