Segment
1. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Upper-middle2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Upper-middle3. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Lowcost
Comparison: Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van vs. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Conditionally recommended2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended3. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Conditionally recommended2. Kumho PorTran CW51 Conditionally recommended3. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,2 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,8 | 3,0 | 2,6 |
| Falken EuroWinter VAN01 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,3 | 3,2 | 4,0 | 2,3 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 1,8 |
| Kumho PorTran CW51 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,6 | 4,1 | 3,0 | 2,6 | 3,0 | 3,0 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||
