Segment
1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Matador (40%). But when it comes to comparing Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van and Continental VanContact Winter, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Continental VanContact Winter first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the MPS530 Sibir Snow Van and the VanContact Winter were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van has C wet grip rating, whereas 98% of Continental VanContact Winter has B rating.
| # | Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van
| Continental VanContact Winter
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental VanContact Winter Premium2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Lowcost
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended
1. Continental VanContact Winter Recommended2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,2 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,8 | 3,0 | 2,6 |
| Continental VanContact Winter Rating: Recommended | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 2,8 | 3,1 | 3,0 | 2,2 |
| Show test details | |||||||