Comparison: Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 533

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 359

3. Matador MP93 Nordicca 92

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 23x

3. Matador MP93 Nordicca 4x

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 4x

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 5.

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 11.

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 11.

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 21.

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 30.

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 38.

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 11.04

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 16.75

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Matador MP93 Nordicca 2025

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 2022

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 2020

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory

4. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

79%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

74%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

31%

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 84%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 37%

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 79%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72%

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 3%

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 72%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 53%

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 89%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 80%

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca -57%

1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca C

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

74%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

72%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

70%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

55%

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 88%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 77%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca -26%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 67%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 64%

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 53%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

91%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

72%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

70%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

46%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 80%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 71%

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 44%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 68%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 68%

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 35%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 71%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 68%

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 61%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

83%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

80%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

30%

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 83%

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 80%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 30%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

76%

Falken
EuroWinter HS01

73%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

0%

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 73%

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca -118%

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 D

3. Matador MP93 Nordicca D

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E