Comparison: Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 533

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

3. Matador MP93 Nordicca 92

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

3. Matador MP93 Nordicca 4x

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 4x

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 11.

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 11.

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 21.

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 38.

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 16.75

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

3. Matador MP93 Nordicca 2025

4. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 2020

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

78%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

74%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

31%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 78%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 76%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 72%

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 3%

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 84%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 76%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 37%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 82%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 79%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 53%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 80%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca -57%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca C

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

91%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

73%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

70%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

46%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 93%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 79%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 71%

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 44%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 75%

3. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 68%

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 35%

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 90%

2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 71%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 65%

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca 61%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

74%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

72%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

55%

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 88%

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 74%

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca -26%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

83%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

30%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

3. Matador MP93 Nordicca 30%

4. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P -27%

Yokohama
BluEarth winter V905

76%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

37%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

0%

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

3. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 37%

4. Matador MP93 Nordicca -118%

1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 C

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

3. Matador MP93 Nordicca D

4. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E