Segment
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle4. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
Comparison: Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. Michelin ALPIN 6 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Michelin ALPIN 6 4.354. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Exemplary2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good4. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Good3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory4. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 37,8 | ||||||
| Michelin Alpin 6 | 34,1 | 26,4 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,8 | 1,4 | 1,8 | 1,5 | 2,7 | 1,5 |
| Matador MP93 Nordicca Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 3,4 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 2,3 | 2,9 | 2,0 |
| Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Good | 2,4 | 2,0 | 2,4 | 1,9 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 2,0 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,7 | 2,4 | 2,1 | 3,4 | 2,5 |
| Show test details | |||||||
