Segment
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
Comparison: Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (56%) than Matador (40%). The first tyre test of Matador MP93 Nordicca was done in 2022, compared to 2015 when was the Firestone Winterhawk 3 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Matador MP93 Nordicca dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (92%) of the Firestone Winterhawk 3 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Matador MP93 Nordicca
| Firestone Winterhawk 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow traction
Snow handling
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry driving behavior
Ice
(Overall rating)Ice braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
2. Matador MP93 Nordicca -118%
