Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle3. Uniroyal WinterExpert Upper-middle4. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
Comparison: Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Uniroyal WinterExpert
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Uniroyal WinterExpert 11.254. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory4. Uniroyal WinterExpert Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient4. Uniroyal WinterExpert Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 37,8 | ||||||
| Falken EuroWinter HS01 | 36,3 | 25,9 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Uniroyal WinterExpert | 36,9 | 26,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,8 | 1,4 | 1,8 | 1,5 | 2,7 | 1,5 |
| Matador MP93 Nordicca Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 3,4 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 2,3 | 2,9 | 2,0 |
| Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,0 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 2,7 | 2,5 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,0 | 1,8 | 2,7 | 2,4 | 2,1 | 3,4 | 2,5 |
| Uniroyal WinterExpert Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 3,3 | 1,7 | 1,8 | 1,5 | 2,9 | 2,5 |
| Show test details | |||||||
