Segment
1. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Upper-middle2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost
Comparison: Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. Falken EuroWinter HS01 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good2. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Satisfactory3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory3. Falken EuroWinter HS01 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 37,8 | ||||||
| Falken EuroWinter HS01 | 36,3 | 25,9 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,8 | 1,4 | 1,8 | 1,5 | 2,7 | 1,5 |
| Matador MP93 Nordicca Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 3,4 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 2,3 | 2,9 | 2,0 |
| Falken EuroWinter HS01 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,3 | 3,5 | 2,0 | 2,2 | 2,5 | 2,7 | 2,5 |
| Show test details | |||||||
