Segment
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 38,6 | - | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,2 | 29,3 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 37,4 | 30,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 37,8 | ||||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
