Comparison: Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 178

2. Matador MP93 Nordicca 92

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 29x

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 23x

3. Matador MP93 Nordicca 4x

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 1.

3. Matador MP93 Nordicca 11.

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 13.

3. Matador MP93 Nordicca 38.

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 3.66

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.65

3. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2025

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P 2025

3. Matador MP93 Nordicca 2025

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Test winner

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P Good

3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

78.7%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70.3%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

38.7%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P B

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

3. Matador MP93 Nordicca C

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93.2%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

76.6%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

48.7%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

86.3%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71.8%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

56%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

30%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

0%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

75%

Continental
WinterContact TS 870 P

70.9%

Matador
MP93 Nordicca

0%

1. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P C

2. Matador MP93 Nordicca D

3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E