• 12 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Matador (40%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 81% compared to 40% of the Matador MP93 Nordicca. The first tyre test of Matador MP93 Nordicca was done in 2022, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R18 test, where both the MP93 Nordicca and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Matador MP93 Nordicca has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has B rating.

# Matador MP93 Nordicca
/40%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
/81%

Add to comparison

Matador
BFGoodrich
DimensionsR13 - R20 R14 - R19
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

2

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test31,429,2
Matador MP93 Nordicca38,6-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 235,229,3
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test32,8
Matador MP93 Nordicca37,8
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 235,825,4
Show test details