Segment
1. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost2. Barum Polaris 6 Lowcost
Comparison: Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. Barum Polaris 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Barum winter tyres are slightly better rated (73%) than Matador (40%). In this particular case, the Barum Polaris 6 has a better rating of 83% compared to 40% of the Matador MP93 Nordicca. The first tyre test of Matador MP93 Nordicca was done in 2022, compared to 2025 when was the Barum Polaris 6 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Matador MP93 Nordicca dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (87%) of the Barum Polaris 6 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Matador MP93 Nordicca
| Barum Polaris 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 6 Good2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 6 Good2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
