Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Uniroyal WinterExpert Upper-middle3. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle4. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost5. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
Comparison: Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Uniroyal WinterExpert vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
3. Uniroyal WinterExpert 11.254. Barum Polaris 5 15.155. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good3. Barum Polaris 5 Good4. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory5. Uniroyal WinterExpert Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory3. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended4. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient5. Uniroyal WinterExpert Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 38,6 | - | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,6 | 31,0 | |||||
| Uniroyal WinterExpert | 35,0 | 30,7 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,2 | 29,3 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 31,4 | 30,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 37,8 | ||||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37,5 | 26,9 | |||||
| Uniroyal WinterExpert | 36,9 | 26,1 | |||||
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,8 | 25,4 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 32,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
