Segment
1. Matador MP93 Nordicca Lowcost2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Matador MP93 Nordicca vs. Barum Polaris 5 vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Barum Polaris 5 15.153. Matador MP93 Nordicca 23.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. Barum Polaris 5 Good3. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory2. Matador MP93 Nordicca Satisfactory3. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 38,6 | - | |||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 35,6 | 31,0 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 37,4 | 30,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
| Matador MP93 Nordicca | 37,8 | ||||||
| Barum Polaris 5 | 37,5 | 26,9 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | 36,8 | 26,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
