Segment
2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
Comparison: Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Matador (40%). But when it comes to comparing Matador MP92 Sibir Snow and Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Matador MP92 Sibir Snow was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the MP92 Sibir Snow and the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Matador MP92 Sibir Snow dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (90%) of the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 6 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
6
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 27,3 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 37,4 | 28,6 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 33,4 | 28,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 34,8 | - | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 32 | 24,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2- | 2- | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 1- | 1- | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 36,6 | 28,6 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 34,9 | 27,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,2 | 25,9 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 38,4 | - | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 35,9 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 40,6 | 26,4 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 39,1 | 26,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
