18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 vs. Goodyear UltraGrip 9

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%	Fulda Kristall Control HP2 /64%	Goodyear UltraGrip 9 /0%

Dimensions	R15 - R18	R15 - R19	R14 - R16
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Premium

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

3. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 50

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

3. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 41

Number of tests

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 25x

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 17x

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

Best position in test

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 1.

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2.

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 9.

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 23.

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 3.65

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 12.36

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 2025

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 2020

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

Best rating in test

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Highly recommended

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Good

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Snow

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
UltraGrip 9

95%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

85%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

77%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
UltraGrip 9

82%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

81%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
UltraGrip 9

89%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

87%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

71%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 B

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 C

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

Costs

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
UltraGrip 9

87%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

79%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 C

2. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 E

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

88%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

83%

Goodyear
UltraGrip 9

83%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Goodyear UltraGrip 9 68 dB

2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 72 dB

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Goodyear
UltraGrip 9

81.3%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

79.3%

Fulda
Kristall Control HP2

71.4%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 5 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	37,4	28,6
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	36,8	28,6
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	34,8	-
Fulda Kristall Control HP2	33,5	24,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1	1
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2-	2-
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	1	2
Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Rating: Good	2	2-	1	2
Show test details