18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Buy %

#	Matador MP92 Sibir Snow /0%	Firestone Winterhawk 3 /0%	Yokohama W.drive V905 /0%

Dimensions	R15 - R18	R13 - R18	R16 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Upper-middle

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Upper-middle

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 66

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 43

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 8

Number of tests

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 14x

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 10x

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 8x

Best position in test

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 3.

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 7.

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 12.

Worst position in test

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 24.

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 32.

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 33.

Average position in tests

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 14

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 16

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 22.25

Year of the last test

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 2020

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 2019

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 2019

Best rating in test

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Satisfactory

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 Satisfactory

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 Conditionally recommended

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 Conditionally recommended

Snow

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
W.drive V905

82%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

81%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

78%

Snow traction

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 80%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 76%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 75%

Snow braking

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 84%

2. Yokohama W.drive V905 80%

3. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 78%

Snow handling

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 89%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 82%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 76%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Yokohama
W.drive V905

76%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

73%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

69%

Dry braking

1. Yokohama W.drive V905 83%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 77%

3. Firestone Winterhawk 3 74%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

71%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

70%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

52%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow C

2. Firestone Winterhawk 3 C

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

81%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

72%

Mileage

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 78%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 70%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 E

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow F

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

76%

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

75%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

48%

Exterior noise

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 83%

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow 81%

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 52%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Firestone Winterhawk 3 ?

2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow ?

3. Yokohama W.drive V905 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Firestone
Winterhawk 3

89%

Matador
MP92 Sibir Snow

80%

Yokohama
W.drive V905

69%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 7 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	34,8	-
Firestone Winterhawk 3	34,3	25,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	1-	2+	1	1
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: Satisfactory	3+	2-	2-	2-
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: Conditionally recommended	3	3+	2+	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2018 195/65 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,3	27
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	36,6	28,6
Firestone Winterhawk 3	38,2	27,8
Yokohama W.drive V905	36,6	29,5
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	38,4	-
Firestone Winterhawk 3	36,3	27,9
Yokohama W.drive V905	34,7	28,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2016 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34,2	25
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	40,6	26,4
Firestone Winterhawk 3	39,8	27,5
Yokohama W.drive V905	39,9	26,9
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2016 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	2,3	2,1	1,7	2,0	2,8	1,5	1,5
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: -	3,7	2,6	2,2	2,5	3,2	2,0	1,9
Firestone Winterhawk 3 Rating: -	3,0	2,9	2,4	2,0	2,8	2,0	2,2
Yokohama W.drive V905 Rating: -	3,3	2,5	2,1	2,9	4,0	3,5	2,4
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2015 185/60 R15

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	36,8	27,7
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow	43,1	28,9
Firestone Winterhawk 3	41,9	28,9
Yokohama W.drive V905	42,6	29,4
Show test details

Comparison: Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Yokohama W.drive V905

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Mutual Tests Available

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands