Comparison: Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (87%) than Matador (40%). But when it comes to comparing Matador MP92 Sibir Snow and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the MP92 Sibir Snow and the Blizzak LM-001 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Matador MP92 Sibir Snow has C wet grip rating, whereas 72% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 has B rating.
Great news! We found mutual test data
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s) with detailed performance data. This page shows you a comprehensive comparison based on actual head-to-head test results instead of general rankings.
You can explore discipline-by-discipline comparisons, view the spider chart, check price differences, and see which tests were used for this analysis. Or view the general comparison →
Mutual tests overview
Detailed head-to-head comparison based on actual test results
Tests used in comparison (1)
| Organization | Season | Year | Dimension | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAC
|
Winter
|
2016 | 225/45 R17 | View |
Performance comparison
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Performance spider chart
Visual comparison of all performance categories from mutual tests.
Dimensions and prices
Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.
