• 18 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: Matador MP92 Sibir Snow vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Matador (40%). The first tyre test of Matador MP92 Sibir Snow was done in 2015, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the MP92 Sibir Snow and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Matador MP92 Sibir Snow has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has B rating.

# Matador MP92 Sibir Snow
/0%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
/81%

Add to comparison

Matador
BFGoodrich
DimensionsR15 - R18 R14 - R19
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual Tests Available

These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

2

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,127,3
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow37,428,6
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 235,627,9
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test32,225,9
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow38,4-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 235,125,9
Show test details