Segment
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium2. Firestone Roadhawk Upper-middle3. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Upper-middle4. Matador Hectorra 5 Lowcost5. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Lowcost
Comparison: Matador Hectorra 5 vs. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 vs. Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Kleber Dynaxer HP3
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
5. Matador Hectorra 5 34.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Firestone Roadhawk Exemplary2. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory3. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Satisfactory4. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer HP3 Satisfactory2. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory3. Firestone Roadhawk Conditionally recommended4. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Matador Hectorra 5 | 37.7 | 34.1 | |||||
| Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 | 34.9 | 29.7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
