Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium3. Toyo Proxes Sport 2 Upper-middle4. Linglong Sport Master Lowcost5. Avon ZV7 Lowcost
Comparison: Linglong Sport Master vs. Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Toyo Proxes Sport 2 vs. Vredestein Quatrac Pro vs. Avon ZV7
Number of sizes available
1. Avon ZV7 278
Number of tests
Best position in test
5. Avon ZV7 8.
Worst position in test
5. Avon ZV7 42.
Average position in tests
4. Toyo Proxes Sport 2 10.295. Avon ZV7 18.55
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary2. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary4. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory5. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
3. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory4. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended5. Avon ZV7 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master | 33.9 | 25.2 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro | 34.2 | 28.8 | |||||
| Toyo Proxes Sport 2 | 34.6 | 29.5 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master | 34.2 | 27.4 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro | 35.0 | 31.2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
