Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Linglong Sport Master Lowcost3. Nexen N fera Sport Lowcost
Comparison: Linglong Sport Master vs. Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Nexen N fera Sport
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nexen N fera Sport Exemplary2. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary3. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
2. Nexen N fera Sport Satisfactory3. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
2
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master | 33.9 | 25.2 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro | 34.2 | 28.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master | 34.2 | 27.4 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro | 35.0 | 31.2 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Sport | 35.0 | 30.9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
