Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Linglong Sport Master Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Linglong summer tyres are slightly better rated (43%) than Vredestein (30%). In this particular case, the Linglong Sport Master has a better rating of 76% compared to 72% of the Vredestein Ultrac Pro. The first tyre test of Linglong Sport Master was done in 2023, compared to 2024 when was the Vredestein Ultrac Pro first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2026 245/45 R19 test, where both the Sport Master and the Ultrac Pro were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Linglong Sport Master
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R18 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Premium2. Linglong Sport Master Lowcost
1. Vredestein Ultrac Pro Exemplary2. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
2. Linglong Sport Master Satisfactory
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.8 | 25.2 | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master | 33.9 | 25.2 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro | 34.2 | 28.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Linglong Sport Master | 34.2 | 27.4 | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Pro | 35.0 | 31.2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||