Segment
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium2. Linglong Sport Master 4S Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein allround tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Linglong (60%). In this particular case, the Linglong Sport Master 4S has a better rating of 61% compared to 52% of the Vredestein Quatrac Pro. The first tyre test of Linglong Sport Master 4S was done in 2025, compared to 2019 when was the Vredestein Quatrac Pro first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/45 R18 test, where both the Sport Master 4S and the Quatrac Pro were tested.
| # | Linglong Sport Master 4S
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium2. Linglong Sport Master 4S Lowcost
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary2. Linglong Sport Master 4S Satisfactory
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended2. Linglong Sport Master 4S Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Linglong Sport Master 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Vredestein Quatrac Pro Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||