Segment
1. Linglong Sport Master 4S Lowcost2. Viking FourTech Plus Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Viking). Generally, Linglong allround tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Viking (56%). In this particular case, the Linglong Sport Master 4S has a better rating of 61% compared to 56% of the Viking FourTech Plus. The first tyre test of Linglong Sport Master 4S was done in 2025, compared to 2024 when was the Viking FourTech Plus first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/45 R18 test, where both the Sport Master 4S and the FourTech Plus were tested.
| # | Linglong Sport Master 4S
| Viking FourTech Plus
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Linglong Sport Master 4S Lowcost2. Viking FourTech Plus Lowcost
1. Viking FourTech Plus Satisfactory2. Linglong Sport Master 4S Satisfactory
1. Viking FourTech Plus Satisfactory2. Linglong Sport Master 4S Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Linglong Sport Master 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Viking FourTech Plus Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 3+ | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||