Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium2. Linglong Sport Master 4S Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Linglong (60%). In this particular case, the Michelin CrossClimate 2 has a better rating of 91% compared to 61% of the Linglong Sport Master 4S. The first tyre test of Linglong Sport Master 4S was done in 2025, compared to 2021 when was the Michelin CrossClimate 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/45 R18 test, where both the Sport Master 4S and the CrossClimate 2 were tested.
| # | Linglong Sport Master 4S
| Michelin CrossClimate 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium2. Linglong Sport Master 4S Lowcost
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Test winner2. Linglong Sport Master 4S Satisfactory
2. Linglong Sport Master 4S Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Linglong Sport Master 4S Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 3+ | ||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||