Comparison: Linglong Sport Master 4S vs. Kleber Quadraxer 3

When comparing the Linglong Sport Master 4S and the Kleber Quadraxer 3 across independent tyre tests, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 emerges as the stronger all‑round performer. Our aggregated score for Kleber is 79% versus 61% for the Linglong, and this difference is reflected in published tests and specific discipline results.

Test positions: in the AutoBild comparison (15 tyres) the Linglong Sport Master 4S finished 14th, while the Kleber Quadraxer 3 placed 9th. That gap of five places is consistent with the performance trade‑offs visible in wet, dry and snow testing.

Strengths — Kleber Quadraxer 3

• Snow and comfort: Multiple reviews highlight the Quadraxer 3's snow handling and ride comfort. AutoBild 2025 praises it as a “Schneetalent” and one of the best second‑brand offerings from a premium maker (Michelin), and Tyre Reviews notes its comfort and snow performance.


• Aquaplaning resistance: In the AutoBild test the Quadraxer 3 showed a notable result for longitudinal aquaplaning, improving its wet credentials compared with cheaper alternatives.


• Overall test ranking: Better average placing across the available tests and higher overall score (79%), indicating more consistent performance across conditions.

Weaknesses — Kleber Quadraxer 3

• Tender on dry grip and economy: AutoBild 2025 notes slightly weaker dry performance and a higher rolling resistance, which means increased fuel/energy consumption compared with the best in class.

Strengths — Linglong Sport Master 4S

• Dry performance: The Sport Master 4S shows competent dry handling and braking for its segment; Tyre Reviews and AutoBild list dry handling as a high point.


• Value proposition: AutoBild 2025 describes the Linglong as a “Kilometerfresser” with low cost — a budget tyre that offers acceptable longevity for the price.

Weaknesses — Linglong Sport Master 4S

• Snow and overall balance: The Linglong’s light weaknesses in snow were called out as limiting its final result in AutoBild 2025; combined with modest wet performance this pushed it to the bottom of that particular test (14/15).


• Lower overall score: At 61% the Linglong trails the Kleber by a wide margin, reflecting inconsistent performance across relevant conditions.

Head‑to‑head conclusion
If you prioritize winter capability, comfort and a more balanced tyre across wet, snow and dry, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 is the better choice — it scored higher in tests and delivered reliable snow and aquaplaning performance despite a small penalty in dry grip and rolling resistance. The Linglong Sport Master 4S is best considered a budget option: good dry handling for the price and economical mileage but noticeably weaker on snow and overall test placings.

No direct “replacement” model is listed for either tyre on our site (the Quadraxer 3 follows the Quadraxer 2 as an update rather than being replaced). For full specifications and detailed test pages see the tyre pages: Kleber Quadraxer 3 and Linglong Sport Master 4S. Manufacturer information: Kleber (manufacturer) and Linglong (manufacturer).

Verdict: choose Kleber Quadraxer 3 for a better all‑round performer and winter confidence; pick the Linglong Sport Master 4S only if upfront cost and dry handling at a low price are your primary concerns.