Segment
1. Linglong Grip Master 4S Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Ceat). Generally, Ceat allround tyres are slightly better rated (69%) than Linglong (60%). In this particular case, the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive has a better rating of 63% compared to 59% of the Linglong Grip Master 4S. The first tyre test of Linglong Grip Master 4S was done in 2023, compared to 2022 when was the Ceat 4 SeasonDrive first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Grip Master 4S and the 4 SeasonDrive were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Linglong Grip Master 4S
| Ceat 4 SeasonDrive
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Linglong Grip Master 4S Lowcost
1. Linglong Grip Master 4S Satisfactory2. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive Conditionally recommended
1. Ceat 4 SeasonDrive Conditionally recommended2. Linglong Grip Master 4S Conditionally recommended
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 38.0 | 43.9 | |||||
| Linglong Grip Master 4S | 38.2 | 47.5 | |||||
| Ceat 4 SeasonDrive | 38.6 | 47.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||

| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Linglong Grip Master 4S | 41.3 | 53 | |||||
| Ceat 4 SeasonDrive | 40.8 | 50.1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||