Segment
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Upper-middle2. Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 Lowcost
Comparison: Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 vs. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Toyo). Generally, Toyo summer tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Linglong (43%). But when it comes to comparing Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 and Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Firmenauto 2016 215/60 R17 test, where both the GREENMAX 4x4 and the Proxes CF2 SUV were tested.
| # | Linglong GREENMAX 4x4
| Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R22 - R22 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Satisfactory2. Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Conditionally recommended2. Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,6 | 9,7 | 10 | 10 | |||
| Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 Rating: Sufficient | 5,5 | 6,6 | 6 | 8 | |||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 7,0 | 7,9 | 10 | 10 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
