Segment
1. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle2. Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 Lowcost
Comparison: Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 vs. Nokian Line SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Linglong (43%). But when it comes to comparing Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 and Nokian Line SUV, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Firmenauto 2016 215/60 R17 test, where both the GREENMAX 4x4 and the Line SUV were tested.
| # | Linglong GREENMAX 4x4
| Nokian Line SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R22 - R22 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,6 | 9,7 | 10 | 10 | |||
| Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 Rating: Sufficient | 5,5 | 6,6 | 6 | 8 | |||
| Nokian Line SUV Rating: Good | 9,0 | 7,9 | 7 | 8 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
