Segment
2. Michelin Primacy 3 Premium3. Nokian Line SUV Upper-middle4. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Upper-middle5. Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 Lowcost
Comparison: Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 vs. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 vs. Michelin Primacy 3 vs. Nokian Line SUV vs. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV
Table of contents:
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Exemplary2. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Very good3. Nokian Line SUV Good4. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Satisfactory5. Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line SUV Good2. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Recommended3. Michelin Primacy 3 Recommended4. Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Conditionally recommended5. Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 9,6 | 9,7 | 10 | 10 | |||
| Linglong GREENMAX 4x4 Rating: Sufficient | 5,5 | 6,6 | 6 | 8 | |||
| Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV 4x4 Rating: Very good | 9,0 | 9,7 | 8 | 8 | |||
| Michelin Primacy 3 Rating: Good | 8,4 | 9,6 | 10 | 10 | |||
| Nokian Line SUV Rating: Good | 9,0 | 7,9 | 7 | 8 | |||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 7,0 | 7,9 | 10 | 10 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
