Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Premium2. Linglong Green-Max Lowcost
Comparison: Linglong Green-Max vs. Vredestein Ultrac Satin
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Linglong summer tyres are slightly better rated (45%) than Vredestein (34%). But when it comes to comparing Linglong Green-Max and Vredestein Ultrac Satin, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Linglong Green-Max was done in 2016, compared to 2017 when was the Vredestein Ultrac Satin first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the Green-Max and the Ultrac Satin were tested.
| # | Linglong Green-Max
| Vredestein Ultrac Satin
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R16 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Satin Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
| Linglong Green-Max | 192 | 90 | 102 | ||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Satin Rating: Highly recommended | 222 | 109 | 113 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
