Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Linglong Green-Max Lowcost
Comparison: Linglong Green-Max vs. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (81%) than Linglong (45%). But when it comes to comparing Linglong Green-Max and Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2020 225/50 R17 test, where both the Green-Max and the Ventus Prime3 K125 were tested.
| # | Linglong Green-Max
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry steering response
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 264 | 137 | 129 | ||||
| Linglong Green-Max | 192 | 90 | 102 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Highly recommended | 240 | 111 | 129 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
