Segment
1. Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP Lowcost2. Sava Eskimo HP2 Lowcost
Comparison: Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP vs. Sava Eskimo HP2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (62%) than Linglong (0%). The first tyre test of Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP was done in 2019, compared to 2017 when was the Sava Eskimo HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 225/50 R17 test, where both the Green-Max Winter UHP and the Eskimo HP2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP
| Sava Eskimo HP2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R15 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 14.93
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Sava Eskimo HP2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 1,5 | |
| Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP Rating: Poor | 5,5 | 3,5 | 2,2 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 2,5 | |
| Sava Eskimo HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,1 | 3,0 | 2,2 | 2,4 | 4,0 | 2,5 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP | 35,2 | - | |||||
| Sava Eskimo HP2 | 33,6 | 24,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
