Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium2. Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP Lowcost
Comparison: Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than Linglong (0%). Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 225/50 R17 test, where both the Green-Max Winter UHP and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R14 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Snow
(Overall rating)Ice
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,6 | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 1,5 | |
| Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP Rating: Poor | 5,5 | 3,5 | 2,2 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 2,5 | |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Satisfactory | 1,6 | 1,9 | 2,8 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 3,0 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 29,2 | 24 | |||||
| Linglong Green-Max Winter UHP | 35,2 | - | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 | 29,2 | 24,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
