Segment
1. Toyo Proxes CF2 Upper-middle2. Linglong Green-Max HP010 Lowcost
Comparison: Linglong Green-Max HP010 vs. Toyo Proxes CF2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Linglong) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Toyo). Generally, Toyo summer tyres are slightly better rated (67%) than Linglong (43%). But when it comes to comparing Linglong Green-Max HP010 and Toyo Proxes CF2, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Linglong Green-Max HP010 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Toyo Proxes CF2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Green-Max HP010 and the Proxes CF2 were tested.
| # | Linglong Green-Max HP010
| Toyo Proxes CF2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Toyo Proxes CF2 17.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Linglong Green-Max HP010 Satisfactory2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Linglong Green-Max HP010 Satisfactory2. Toyo Proxes CF2 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.
1
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,9 | 1,5 | 2,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 | ||
| Linglong Green-Max HP010 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 3,5 | 2,1 | ||
| Toyo Proxes CF2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,8 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,0 | 2,0 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
